Today, the 112th Congress officially takes its seat. Anyone who watched the November elections realizes that a major change in philosophy takes the gavel in Washington, riding on the momentum of the “Tea Party” movement.
Sure, we pretty much have no idea how that wave is going to affect education policy on Capitol Hill. During the campaign, those Tea Party candidates spoke little, if at all, about education. We know they’d prefer to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education, but we really don’t know where they stand on ESEA reauthorization, turnaround schools, charters, and all of the other topics that seem to freeze up the Congress.
But all of the analysis pieces on how the Tea Party movement will affect government in general has Eduflack thinking. What would happen if we applied the Tea Party philosophy to education? No, I’m not talking about federal education policy, but rather the K-12 education space in general. Perhaps it would look a little like this:
Fiscal Responsibility (Funding) — “We are simply paying too much on public education. The federal government keeps taking more and more from our paychecks to pay for expensive programs like Race to the Top and i3, and the states are taking more and more in property taxes to cover the rest. We need to be smarter with how we spend our education dollars. Why is it some of our best school districts can educate kids at $10,000 a head, while our worst-performing districts are spending close to twice that? It just doesn’t make sense. We need to get back to basics, focus on the core needs of our kids, and ensure we are receiving return on investment for our education dollars. It is time to do more with less.”
Limited Government (Control) — “The federal government needs to get out of our classrooms. No one knows what our kids need best than our local community. We elect our local school boards to look after our interests. They know us. We know them. And they held accountable for their actions. The feds care about our money, our localities care about our kids. We must restore local control to our schools, telling the feds to keep their noses out of how we spend our money, how we teach our kids, how we test our kids, and how we know when we are doing a good job. Our schools, our rules.”
Free Markets (Choice) — “We need to restore power to individual parents and individual families. As the individual is the one funding our schools, the individual should have the power to decide how those dollars are spent. if your neighborhood schools aren’t doing the job, you should have the right to take your child — and your dollars — and go to a school that meets your needs. Speaking through the pocketbook is the only way to get those broken schools to fix themselves, and it is the only way to ensure our kids get the education they need. We should not just accept what we have been given. We need to encourage choice and competition, letting the schools and the teachers who have failed us be cycled out of the system for good.”
Personal Responsibility (Parents) — “For too long we have trusted government to do what is right for our kids. As a result, our schools are failing and our kids are uncompetitive. It is time to take that responsibility back. The US Department of Education isn’t going to fix our schools. The state isn’t going to fix our schools. Parents are going to fix our schools. It is time for all parents to rise up and demand better. It is time to get in schools, demand answers, and refuse to leave until those answers are put into practice. These are our schools, and we need to retake ownership of them.”
Maybe it is just me, but aren’t we already sitting down to a tea party in K-12 education? We are making hard choices, asking our schools to do more with less and questioning high per-pupil expenditures in struggling urban districts. There is a growing chorus (led by the new chairman of the House Education Committee, John Kline) to restore more local control to education, taking away much of the power shift resulting from NCLB. We’ve long talked about school choice, with the current turnaround schools effort likely leading to a greater call. And even President Obama has been talking for the past few years on parental responsibility and how families need to take more active, hands on, and impactful roles if their kids are to be college and career ready.
Is Michelle Rhee’s Students First education’s Tea Party Patriots? Is 50-CAN or DFER’s “Ticket to Teach” the edu-Tea Party Express? Only time will tell …