How Valuable Are the Race Fire Drills?

Eduflack accountability, Arne Duncan, charter schools, national standards, RTT, teachers

In recent months, we have seen state departments of education and state legislatures scurry to make themselves eligible and better positioned to win a federal Race to the Top grant.  From knocking down the firewalls between student performance data and teachers to smoothing the path for charter school expansion to adopting common core standards to just demonstrating a hospitable environment for education reform and change, states have been doing anything and everything to gain a better position for the Race. 

Earlier this week, Michigan announced sweeping reforms to put them in line with the federal requirements.  California is currently debating similar positions (with what seems like growing concerns).  And we seem genuine changes in reform culture in states like Indiana, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and many others along the way.  (Every state, that is, except for the Republic of Texas, which as of yesterday still hasn’t committed to even pursuing RttT, despite the $250K it received from the Gates Foundation to prepare its application.)

But one has to ask, is it another tale of too little, too late?  In November, the U.S. Department of Education released a comprehensive scorecard of how RttT applications would be scored, breaking down allotments so specifically that it included everything but throwing out the low score from the Ukrainian judges.  Every state is working off the same 500-point scale, building a workplan that aligns as closely with Arne Duncan’s four pillars as humanly (or bureaucratically) possible.  We’re working toward extra points for STEM and for charter schools and for demonstrating a general culture of reform.  And we’re growing more and more mindful of how those points break down, recognizing, for instance, that STEM and charters are worth virtually the same score as turning around low-performing schools.

Often overlooked in the discussion, though, is the fact that 52 percent of a state’s RttT application is supposed to be based on past accomplishment and achievement.  So for all of those states who just recently removed the caps and changed the charter laws, will they only earn half-credit for their plans for the future, or do we recognize them for the intent of their efforts?  What about those states, like California, New York, and Wisconsin, that are just now taking down those data firewalls?  Are they out of luck when it comes to evaluating their past performance?  And will ED reviewers really dock Texas 80 points (nearly 15 percent of the total score) for not signing onto common standards, when Texas’ state standards may already be closely aligned with where the NGA/CCSSO effort is ultimately headed?  Is the 52/48 split a hard-and-fast rule, or is it meant as a guiding suggestion to states to shape how they write they apps, with ED officials hoping to see equal focus on what states have done in these areas and what they are planning to do in the future?

If we believe the former, we are looking at a very, very select group of states that are qualified to win RttT in the end.  How many states come to the table with real, tangible, and longitudinal successes on all four of the pillars of Race?  How many can really talk about their strong work in effective data systems?  How many have really invested in meaningful teacher quality efforts, including state-led teacher incentive pay programs?  How many are doing what their legislatures and SEAs have now committed them to do in the future (and more importantly, how many can prove it)?

If the projections are true, 80 percent of states will be submitting their Phase One applications later this month.  If we are lucky, we’ll have more than four states actually win in Phase One.  (that, my friends, is where Eduflack is setting the Phase One over/under)  What will happen to those states that either are not called for oral defenses in March or fail to wow their dissertation panels?  Do those states go back to the drawing board, and try to turn around a winning app in 30-60 days, or do they lick their wounds, move on, and say they never really wanted the grants in the first place?

Only time will tell.  Regardless, Race has been effective for the enormous influence it has had on changing state laws and policies without doling out a single dollar to support the changes.  We have already changed the culture of public education in the last 12 years, at least in terms of regulation and legislation.  If a state fails to win the Race, they are unlikely to go back and reinstitute the firewalls, re-restrict charters, or pull out of the common core standards movement.  Maybe that was the intent all along …

344 thoughts on “How Valuable Are the Race Fire Drills?”

  12. Mexian valium.

    Valium definiton. Buy valium c.o.d.. Valium no prescription. Valium overnight. What does valium look like. Valium appearance. Valium.

    Reply

  13. Soma buy soma cheap soma soma online.

    Buy soma. Buy soma online. Buy soma online without rx. Buy soma watson brand online 150 tablets. Soma buy soma cheap soma soma online. Buy watson brand soma. Cyclobenzaprine buy prescription soma zanaflex.

    Reply

  19. Buy cheap phentermine without doctor.

    Buy phentermine. Buy phentermine online with paypal. Buy phentermine in the uk. Buy cheap phentermine mg tabs lowest prices. Buy phentermine using pay pal. Buy phentermine online discount cheap pharmacy. Buy cheap phentermine.

    Reply

  29. Phentermine online pharmacy.

    Phentermine online. Online pharmacies phentermine same day shipping. Phentermine prescription online. Cheap phentermine online. Cheapest phentermine online. Online phentermine. Buy phentermine online 37.5mg no prescription. Discount online phentermine.

    Reply

  34. Buy tramadol american express.

    Tramadol cyclophoria buy tramadol generic ultram. Buy tramadol the lowest prices chtiblog com. Buy tramadol. Buy cheap tramadol tramadol mg quick delivery cod. Tramadol great buy. Buy tramadol online best prices limited time off.

    Reply

  36. Buy carisoprodol online lowest price guarantee.

    Pharmacy online carisoprodol description price. Buy carisoprodol online no prescription required. Carisoprodol buy carisoprodol carisoprodol online. Carisoprodol online. Buy carisoprodol online lowest price guarantee. Carisoprodol buy cheap carisoprodol order online.

    Reply

  42. Refills low oxycodone pharmacy system.

    Oxycodone addiction. Oxycodone no prescription. Oxycodone on line. Tramadol in combination with oxycodone. Oxycodone side effects. Oxycodone.

    Reply

  46. Buy phentermine using pay pal.

    Buy phentermine. Buy phentermine online. Buy cheap phentermine best online pharmacy. Buy pal pay phentermine using. Buy phentermine order cheap online. Buy cheap phentermine. Buy ph… phentermine 37 url.

    Reply

Leave a reply to Cheap fioricet. Cancel reply