Bringing Urgency to Early Childhood Ed

Throughout the education world, it seems virtually everyone is jockeying for position in terms of 2009 priorities.  We go through President-elect Obama’s education platform and policy speeches, looking for indications of priorities and preferences.  This week, many an organization waited with baited breath to see what would come out of the Gates Foundation convening, thinking and hoping for new issues or a new priority or two.  And no one is quite sure when (or even if) we’ll see reauthorization of ESEA in the next 12-18 months.

Six years ago, Eduflack was neck deep in scientifically based reading, believing at the time that Early Reading First and similar issues could be the next big thing.  For the past three and a half years, I’ve been focusing on high school reform efforts, seeing that STEM is the logical off-shoot and just the education improvement we need to effectively link education with the economy.  So much so that I am now advocating for the notion of a national public engagement campaign to ensure families and communities recognize that STEM is a necessity, not a luxury, and an approach needed for all students, not just the fortunate ones.
But I can’t shake the notion that I’ve been missing something from the equation, a piece missing from the great learning continuum.  For the past couple of months, my thinking on the “next big thing” has evolved.  Years ago, we saw a spike in interest in preK, as governors across the country proposed the notion of making it universal.  But current economic situations have many a state, most recently Massachusetts, questioning that commitment.  Early childhood education is stepping forward, and is stepping with a hard boot.
Yesterday, Pre-K Now released a new study looking at the ability of middle-class families to afford quality preK for their kids.  The highlight — more than half of the states that fund preK do so by using family income as a determining criteria.  The result — many a middle-class family, families who can feel the immediate benefits of quality preK, are quickly becoming unable to afford the programs their young kids need to maximize the K-12 experience.  Check out the full report here — www.preknow.org/documents/pre-kpinch_Nov2008_report.pdf  
This study becomes important to the overall debate.  So much of the discussion of preK is focused on low-income families. Too many equate preK with Head Start, or see it as glorified babysitting, or generally lack the vision to see that quality preK can serve as a foundational step for developing social and academic skills in all students, ensuring they are prepared for the rigors and opportunities of K-12 (yes, even those rigors of kindergarten).
In releasing its study, Pre-K Now offers three recommendations for the next generation of early childhood education:
* Expand preK, beginning with the most vulnerable children and moving to include those in the middle class
* Consider eligibility factors outside of include to include more children, including those from single-parent and military-connected families
* Offer full-day programs, rather than half-days, to better meet the needs of working families
It is clear we are still in a learning process here.  Is early childhood education education or sociology?  Is it for all kids, or just those at risk?  What does the data show in terms of linkages between preK and K-12 student achievement?  Is it part of the P-20 education continuum, or is it only for those who can afford it or those who qualify for assistance?  
Last week, Eduflack called for the establishment of an Office of Early Childhood Education at the U.S. Department of Education, building off of Obama’s recognition of the issue’s importance and his pledge to prioritize the issue.  Pre-K Now’s Libby Doggett has done me one better, calling for an “Early Education Czar” at the White House to ensure early childhood issues fit into the larger tapestry of education improvement.
Like so many of the great education reform issues, early childhood education is not a simple issue, easily boxed by the powers that be.  It involves education and healthcare and parental engagement and public/private partnerships and funding mixes and intermediaries and places of worship.  It requires levels of training and requirements and oversight and the determination of quality, both from an instructor and a delivery side.  And it requires deep collaboration, particularly in the tough economic times where early childhood ed can be seen by some as a “value add” and not a necessity.
Time will tell if preK fulfills it possibility as being “the” next issue, or if it simply moves back into place and becomes like so many good ideas with promise, but the inability to seize the public interest and the public sense of urgency.  We aren’t there yet.  With the right approach, the right stakeholders, and the call to action, Doggett and her advocates may yet get their wish.  Regardless, their study is a good step forward in reminding all of us that preK, particularly its funding, is a topic that hits all families, no matter where our economic markets may take us.

2 thoughts on “Bringing Urgency to Early Childhood Ed

  1. I have been an Early Childhood School Director for almost two decades and I have seen government policy re: early Education come and go. I am a devote believer in the importance of teaching children early and establishing the foundation for life long learning.Children who graduate my PreK program can read, tie their shoes, articulate their needs in a positive manner and use the appropriate manners.This is not as difficult a task as it may seem if you have a complete team: administration, parent, teacher, and child. Early Education begins with the basics. Coming to school prepared to learn. That means a healthy breakfast. proper clothing, and arriving on time. The rest is up to us, the educators. It is our job to prepare a fun-filled environment that invites exploration and stimulates complex thought. It is the child’s job to be who he/she is.You may have noticed I have not mentioned government. You see for the most part we have operated without governmental influence. We have accepted the lower wages in return for the freedom to create programs which meet the needs of the individuals and communities we serve. The price has been that some families cannot afford quality EC education. I would be happy to invite the government in to help us better serve our community, but with several caveats: learn from the preschools that have proven their merit, they are not all the same and do not teach the same thing in the same way, do not expect us to all look alike, do not burden us with so much paperwork that we can not get out of our offices to mingle with our children, help us pay our staff a decent living wage with basic benefits, and help us provide affordable training for them.Last but not least, help us train parents to understand that because a program is given to them for a reduced rate or for free, does not mean it is of little or no value. Too often, families use us a babysitting service, arrive late or have very poor attendance. We can’t do our job if parents don’t do theirs.Peace & Light,Grace Geller

  2. The Pre-K Now study points out correctly that a high quality pre-K program is the strong foundation that children need for doing well later in school. A key to the success of these programs are professionals in early childhood care and education. Pre-K teachers play an important role in the early development of a child. Most employers in the field of Pre-K education prefer to hire people with an Early Childhood Education degree. The College of Education at Independence University offers a two-year Associate Degree in Early Childhood Education. The university also offers financial aid in the form of loans, scholarships, and grants.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s