RttT Part Two: This Time, We’re Serious

Eduflack accountability, Arne Duncan, RTT

Now that the dust is settling on the recent Race to the Top Phase One announcement (go Tennessee and Delaware!), the remaining states in the union are starting to get serious about their Phase Two apps.  In the last day or so, we’ve now seen that Kansas has decided to opt out  of the Phase Two process, while Phase One finalist Colorado is making additional legislative changes  to look more appealing to judges. 

When the two winners were announced last month, Eduflack (and others) wondered how much help the two winning applications could provide to those seeking Phase Two dollars.  With unique demographics, political situations, and hungers for school reform, there are few states that could just do a “search and replace” with apps from either the First State or the Volunteer State and expect to win the day.

While a great deal has been written about the Phase One apps, particularly, the two winners, the folks over at The New Teacher Project (a org that is in both of the winning apps, I believe) has provided a solid analysis of what the applications can really tell us.  The full analysis can be found here .

Among the most interesting of TNTP’s findings are its seven lessons learned:
* Reform must reach statewide and beyond the four-year grant period (so we must have a continuity plan after the federal dollars dry up)
* Implementation must be certain (no contingencies allowed; it is all or nothing)
* Plans must be clear (this was particularly clear in the Minnesota critique)
* Local advantages are key (the cookie-cutter reform effect doesn’t work)
* Points can be won and lost in unexpected places (with insufficient progress on data systems and lack of a STEM plan singled out)
* On Teachers and Leaders, bold policies are rewarded (but it doesn’t carry the day, as TNTP notes with both Louisiana’s and Rhode Island’s particularly strong and bold teacher plans)
* Borrow concepts, do not cut and paste (with Eduflack still waiting to see if there were perceived Phase One content similarities between applications prepared by the same consulting companies) 

The TNTP analysis also offered a few cautions for judges and the U.S. Department of Education when it comes to Phase Two reviews.  Based on its analysis of the Phase One finalists, TNTP voices real concern over four issues: 1) lack of differentiation of scoring; 2) inflated scores; 3) deviation from scoring guidance; and 4) excessive influence of outliers.

When EdSec Arne Duncan announced the Phase One winners, he made clear that RttT was going to be an exclusive club for a select number of states.  That’s why states like Kansas have already opted out of the second running, and while other states are likely considering the same.  And it has to have many states, particularly those who didn’t make the finalist cut first time around, wondering if it is worth the time and effort to comprehensively overhaul their plans for this go-around.

Whether one was a finalist in Round One or not, each and every state preparing a Phase Two app needs to ask itself a few key questions.  Are we committed to real, substantive, and long-term change and improvement?  Are we prepared to pay for such improvement, both now and in the out years?  Do we have the relationships, partnerships, and promises to truly change the tires on a racecar going 195 miles an hour?  Do we have the legislative support for what will likely require more changes?  Do we have the intestinal fortitude to follow through on our plans?  Are we willing to be truly bold?  Are we willing to stand behind what is right, even if it may be unpopular?  Are we able to continue these plans, even if we have a change in governor, state legislature leadership, or with the state board?  Are we able to demonstrate our plan has been effective, and to measure that effectiveness based on student test scores?  Are we truly ready to lead, without the cover of other states doing the exact same things?

If a state can answer yes to all of the above, without hesitating, it is likely on the right track.  If not …
 

82 thoughts on “RttT Part Two: This Time, We’re Serious”

  1. Could you explain how you can be such an ardent supporter of RttT and be a fan of Diane Ravitch? In reading Diane’s book and speaking to her through email, RttT provides incentives for states to implement the very policies that Diane is criticizing as ineffective at best and harmful at worst.

    Reply

  4. I don’t know if I would describe myself as an ardent supporter of RttT (in fact, I have long been critical of the program, particularly because I believe that many of the efforts a state should pursue are far more expensive than the grant will ever allow).  And I’m certain I have never said on these pages I was a fan of Diane Ravitch. 

    If anything, I am an agitator for education improvement.  I don’t believe in reform for reform’s sake.  Reform must be based on science and proven by the evidence.  Ravitch seems to support that as well, believing that some “reforms” over the past decades were done as blind leap, and then we were surprised when they didn’t work out.

    But I do believe that programs like RttT can be an important catalyst to improvement.  A number of states have made legislative and regulatory changes to their education laws to allow for greater commitments to improvement and a moving away from the status quo.  And most of these states will never see a RttT dime, at least in the current two phases. 

    Reply

  8. Ephedra.

    Where do i buy diet fuel containing ephedra. Buy ephedra. Lipodrene with ephedra. Ephedra bulk. Ephedra yellow jackets. Diet ephedra pill. Ephedra.

    Reply

  9. Can you take ibuprofen with amoxicillin.

    Can you give a dog amoxicillin. Alcohol and amoxicillin. Recommended dosage for amoxicillin. Mix amoxicillin with frontline on cat. Dosing amoxicillin dental abscess.

    Reply

  13. Xanax bars.

    Xanax xr. Xanax side effects. Xanax. Titel auteur datum xanax medication bmnwbbuk. Buy xanax online. Xanax addiction. No prescription xanax.

    Reply

  15. Ephedra.

    Ephedra attorneys san diego. Products containing ephedra. Drug test detect ephedra. Ephedra 30mg. Ephedra near herb. Ephedra lafayette la. Ephedra. Buy ephedra online.

    Reply

  19. Generic cialis.

    Effectiveness comparison levitra cialis. Cialis online. Generic cialis pay by money order. 3gp young size bbs -cialis -gay. Cialis.

    Reply

  21. Ephedrine in salt licks and chicken feed.

    Ephedrine. Ephedrine in salt licks and chicken feed. How to make ephedrine. Ephedrine effects. Ephedrine chicken feed.

    Reply

  22. Herbal stimulant ephedra alternative.

    Atlanta ephedra lawyers. Twinlab metabolift with ephedra. Ephedra products. Ephedra dangers. Diet ephedra pill. Ephedra diet pills. Ephedra.

    Reply

  24. Xanax side effects.

    Buy xanax. Buy cheap xanax without prescription. Symptoms of xanax use. No prescription needed purchasing xanax. Xanax. Ativan vs xanax.

    Reply

  26. Generic xanax no prescription.

    Buy cheap xanax without prescription. Lethal blood levels of xanax. Xanax. Generic xanax no prescription. No prescription xanax.

    Reply

  33. Amoxicillin.

    Amoxicillin soar throat. Amoxicillin pregnancy. Infant amoxicillin reactions. Amoxicillin rebate. Amoxicillin. Amoxicillin drug interactions. Amoxicillin orange suspension. Amoxicillin lowest.

    Reply

  39. Soma muscle relaxant.

    Soma sonic music. Soma side effects. Soma seeds. Soma. Suicide with soma how many does it take. Coupons for soma by chicos.

    Reply

  41. Mix amoxicillin with frontline on cat.

    Buy amoxicillin no prescription required. Side effects of amoxicillin and clavulanate. Kittens amoxicillin dose. Liquid amoxicillin. Side effects of amoxicillin. Duration treatment amoxicillin.

    Reply

  49. Soma without rx.

    Soma next day. Soma side effects. Soma to florida. Soma. Pornstar soma. Soma without prescription 180 count. Soma in urine. Soma online next day. Prescription medication side effects for soma.

    Reply

Leave a comment